CROPIT BAD QUALITY STACKOVERFLOW CODE

Sure, high quality questions are getting good answers, but the skill being devoted to crap questions is simply wasted.

CROPIT BAD QUALITY STACKOVERFLOW CODE

The quality level required to get answers, even answers that have non-trivial effort behind them - somebody pasted the code into their IDE and debugged it themselves for OP - is so tiny that Stack Overflow looks like a wasteland of a forum. Eager answerers motivated by reputation and positive feedback will answer the question - after all, it is definitely answerable and not NARQ because it has some code, and maybe even a problem statement (implied…), right? We need to stop rewarding creating crapĮven the horrendous question above is likely to get answers. The current system puts up zero resistance to the above procedure, only applying nominal penalties after the fact. Click ask and get it published to the front page of the site and tag pages.Copy paste all your code and if you're being generous add the helpful problem statement 'PLZ HALP ME CODE NO WORK I TRY EVERTING NEED BY TOMORROW'.Type a meaningless title like 'HALP ME PLZ NOW' (the system does little to prevent this).Ask a question (click the very prominent 'Ask Question' button shown at the top of every page and click through the non-mandatory guidance text (forget about even taking a tour).Create an account (one click with Google).The only way to address this quality problem associated with scaling is by sacrificing quantity. As a large site, it is inevitable that great masses of crap will be attracted.

Cropit bad quality stackoverflow